Electoral Reform
Building the checks, balances and transparency that modern democracy demands
The Problem
New Zealand has no written constitution, no formal limits on executive power, and no independent ethics body with real enforcement powers. Legislative urgency has escalated sharply: 36.4% of Bills were progressed under urgency in the first eight months of the current government. The House sat only 807 hours in 2022-23, compared with 1,556 for the UK Commons — yet we have no second chamber to compensate. Sir Geoffrey Palmer describes the system as something close to an executive dictatorship where the scrutiny function doesn’t get carried out properly.
30 of 123 MPs hold executive roles, leaving only 93 to staff 12 subject select committees. Select committee hearings have shrunk from hour-long cross-examinations to five-minute formalities. New Zealand is an outlier among comparable Westminster democracies in how its Speaker is appointed — effectively nominated by the governing party rather than elected by secret ballot.
What We Propose
Radical transparency: Research open-data standards and real-time public portals. Experimental evidence (Huwyler et al., 2025, N≈14,100 across seven European countries) demonstrates that MPs who disclose their side income are rated significantly more trustworthy — it is the act of transparency itself that voters reward, regardless of the amounts disclosed.
Public funding of campaigns: Explore models that remove private-donor influence. Eight major parties received $14.7 million in 2025, dominated by a handful of large donors — 28 individuals giving $50,000+ accounted for roughly one-fifth of all donations. Seattle’s Democracy Vouchers programme provides a working model: each voter receives four $25 vouchers, and 84% of voucher donors had never contributed to a campaign before.
Independent ethics commission: A fully independent body with real investigatory and sanctioning powers. Lobbying register: Mandatory transparency for all interested parties. Policy footprint: A mandatory public document tracing which inputs were considered for every significant government decision.
Speaker reform: Secret ballot election, as practised in the UK, Scotland, Wales, Canada, Australia and Ireland. Constructive vote of no confidence: Investigate the German model where Parliament can only express no confidence by simultaneously electing a successor. Regulatory Standards Board: Independent quality assurance for delegated legislation.
Evidence & International Practice
A large-scale vignette experiment across seven European countries confirms that transparency builds rather than erodes trust. Cross-national analysis of 422 parties across 36 OECD countries shows that junior coalition partners in systems with strong parliamentary committees lose approximately 50% less vote share than those in weak-committee systems.
Palmer’s Standing Orders submission documents the erosion of free and frank advice by the public service, with chief executives instructing officials not to provide advice contrary to coalition agreement positions. The Serious Fraud Office estimates New Zealand’s public sector fraud losses at $823 million to $10.24 billion annually. New Zealand ranks 34th out of 38 OECD countries for regulating influence on policymaking.
Phase 2 Standing Orders Committee evidence from 44 additional submissions — including Dreyer’s PhD analysis of 1,503 committee reports, Meager’s experience processing 330,000 submissions, and Hoare/Agnew’s institutional knowledge — transforms select committee reform from aspiration to evidence-grounded programme.
Expected Outcomes
Verified email voting ensures genuine public support.
Support: Electoral Reform
We’ll send a 6-digit code to verify your email. One vote per person per policy.
Your email is used only for verification and will not be shared or used for marketing.
Check your email
We’ve sent a 6-digit verification code. Enter it below to confirm your support.
Vote confirmed!
Thank you for supporting Electoral Reform. Your verified vote has been recorded.
A constitutional and governance framework with genuine checks and balances: transparent decision-making, independent oversight, properly resourced select committees, public campaign funding, and democratic accountability mechanisms that match the tools and knowledge available in the 21st century. These reforms would arrest the democratic decay that New Zealand’s most senior constitutional voices — including Sir Geoffrey Palmer — have identified as an urgent threat.
All policy positions are drawn from the Democracy Reform NZ Blueprint v8.2, supported by over 150 referenced sources.